kaise kaise log

kuhani pe tike huye log,
suvidhaon pe bike huye log,
karte he bargad ki baaten
gamale me uge huye log.

..................

Laharon pe pehre bithaye jate he,
samndaron ki talashi koi nahi leta.

बहुत पहले से उन कदमो की आहत जान लेते है
तुझे आये ज़िन्दगी हम दूर से पहचान लेते है
तबियत अपनी घबराती है जब सुनसान रातो मे
हम ऐसे मे तेरी यादो की चादर तान लेते है

ya babul ki karo prashansha aur use vatavriksh kaho.

ya babul ki karo prashansha aur use vatavriksh kaho.
ya fir jahan khade ho sathi dhoop sekte khade raho
jeene ka andaj teesara mujhko to malum nahi

sach he juuth bolne me takleef shuru me hoti he
ye bhi ek hunar he, jo ate ate hi ata he
kuchh bhi karo magar aise avasar ahi jate he jab
apna sachcha krodh chhipana namumkin ho jata he
ya anugunj para yi banakar yahan wahan jamkar gunjun
ya bhogo apman maje se apni zid par ade raho
jeene.........

sanskar kya he ateet ka ek faltu tukda he
jise kimti samajh nasamajh log sajoye rahte he
thos dharatal par wo hamko paw nahi rakhne deta
ham bekar ke swapni duniya me khoye rahte he
to yug shilpi ki kar saradhana rho adhunik bangale me
ya fir jahan pade ho sathi dhool fankte pade raho
jeene...........

pratibha hoti to he lekkin sirf sanghathan walo me
pakti chhod chalne wale me mahaj sanak ho sakti he
swabhiman kya he naam kawach ka
jise wifalta dharad kar kunthao ke andhakar me so sakti ro sakti he
samachar patro me chamko isase ya usase judkar
ya apne hi kamare me apni tasweere jade raho
jeene..............

mast utsawo bhawya samaroho ki chahal pahal taj kar
kaun yahan ubad khabad me tumhe khojta ayega
kya he paas tumhare jiski pade jarurat auro ko
fati purani chand kitabo se koi kya payega
ya mashin ka purja bankar raho aur hissa pao
ya fir badi shan se apni hi nazaro me bade raho
jeene..............

Gopal Das Neeraj

isi liye to nagar nagar badnam ho gaye mere ansu
mai unka ho gaya ki jinka koi pahredar nahi tha

jinka dhukh likhne ki khatir mile na itihaso ko syahi
nyayalay ko nakhush karke maine unki bahi gawahi
jale uamar bhar jir bhi jinki arthi uthi andhere me hi
khushiyo ki naukari chhod kar mai unka ban gaya sipahi
pad lobhi aalochak kaise karta dard puraskrit mera
maine jo kuchh gaya usme karuda thi shringar nahi tha
isi liye to nagar.........

maine chaha nahi ki koi akar mera dard bataye
bas yah khwahish rahi ki meri umar jamane ko lag jaye
cham cham chunar choli par to lankho hi the likhne wale
meri magar dhidhai maine fati kameejo ke gud gaye
iska hi yah fal he shayad kal jab mai nikla diniya me
gaj far thor mujhe dene ko marghat tak taiyar nahi tha
isi liye to nagar.......

koshish bhi ki kintun ho saka mujhse yah na kabhi jeewan me
iska sathi banu jeth me usase pyar karun sawan
jisko bhi apnaya uski yaad sanjoi man me aise
koi sath suhagin diwa wale jo tulsi poojan me
fir bhi mere swapn mar gaye awiwahit shayad is karad
mere paas sirf kumkum tha kangan pani dar nahi tha
isi liye to nagar.......

doshi he to bas itni hi doshi he meri tarudai
apni umar ghata kar maine har ansu ki uamar badhai
aur gunah kiya he kuchh to bas yah ek gunah kiya he
lok chale jab rajbhawan ko mujhko yaad kuti ki ayi
aaj bhale kuchh bhi keh lo tum
par kal wishw kahe ga sara
neeraj ke pehle geeto me sabkuchh tha pyar nahi tha
isi liye to nagar.......

कह रहा जग वासनामय हो रहा उद्गार मेरा!

कल छिड़ी, होगी ख़तम कल
प्रेम की मेरी कहानी,
कौन हूं मैं, जो रहेगी
विश्व में मेरी निशानी?
क्या किया मैंने नही जो
कर चुका संसार अबतक?
वृद्ध जग को क्यों अखरती
है क्षणिक मेरी जवानी?
मैं छिपाना जानता तो
जग मुझे साधू समझता,
शत्रु मेरा बन गया है
छल-रहित व्यवहार मेरा!
कह रहा जग वासनामय
हो रहा उद्गार मेरा!

Success Is A Habit

The difference between success and failure is neither luck nor the possession of exceptional qualities but always a matter of attitude and habit , and attitude is nothing more than “habit of thought.”

Arrow's impossibility theorem

Arrow's theorem is a mathematical result, but it is often expressed in a non-mathematical way with a statement such as "No voting method is fair", "Every ranked voting method is flawed", or "The only voting method that isn't flawed is a dictatorship". These statements are simplifications of Arrow's result which are not universally considered to be true. What Arrow's theorem does state is that a voting mechanism cannot comply with all of the conditions given above simultaneously for all possible preference orders.Arrow did use the term "fair" to refer to his criteria. Indeed, Pareto efficiency, as well as the demand for non-imposition, seems trivial. Various theorists have suggested weakening the IIA criterion as a way out of the paradox. Proponents of ranked voting methods contend that the IIA is an unreasonably strong criterion, which actually does not hold in most real-life situations. Indeed, the IIA criterion is the one breached in most useful voting systems.Advocates of this position point out that failure of the standard IIA criterion is trivially implied by the possibility of cyclic preferences. If voters cast ballots as follows:7 votes for A > B > C6 votes for B > C > A5 votes for C > A > Bthen the net preference of the group is that A wins over B, B wins over C, and C wins over A. In this circumstance, any system that picks a unique winner, and satisfies the very basic majoritarian rule that a candidate who receives a majority of all first-choice votes must win the election, will fail the IIA criterion. Without loss of generality, consider that if a system currently picks A, and B drops out of the race (as e.g. in a two-round system), the remaining votes will be:7 votes for A > C11 votes for C > AThus, C will win, even though the change (B dropping out) concerned an "irrelevant" alternative candidate who did not win in the original circumstance.So, what Arrow's theorem really shows is that voting is a non-trivial game, and that game theory should be used to predict the outcome of most voting mechanisms. This could be seen as a discouraging result, because a game need not have efficient equilibria, e.g., a ballot could result in an alternative nobody really wanted in the first place, yet everybody voted for.Note, however, that not all voting systems require (or even allow), as input, a strict ordering of all candidates. These systems may then trivially fail the universality criterion. Some systems may satisfy a version of Arrow's theorem with some reformulation of universality and independence of irrelevant alternatives; Warren Smith claims that Range voting is such a system.